Predictions for California Workplace Law Developments in 2025

California legislation and regulation may affect HR in a number of areas this year, including in artificial intelligence, privacy, and industry-specific regulation. Here are some predictions for the state in 2025.

California Will Retake the Lead on Regulating AI 

While a California bill (Assembly Bill 2930) aimed specifically at the use of artificial intelligence in employment did not make the cut in 2024, it will certainly be back this year. The lawmaker who introduced the groundbreaking legislation—which would have required employers to provide notification (and perhaps an accommodation) to workers when AI is used in certain critical ways during hiring or employment—said that she plans to reintroduce the bill in 2025.

Another California bill (Senate Bill 1047), which came close last year to becoming law, would have required developers of high-risk AI models to conduct safety tests and implement shutdown mechanisms to prevent critical harms. While Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed the bill in September, he said in a veto message that safety protocols must be adopted and that he was committed to finding “the appropriate path forward, including legislation and regulation.”

Either by legislation or regulation, California will join and likely surpass other jurisdictions that have recently enacted their own requirements in the absence of comprehensive federal regulation.

Role as the Leader of ‘Trump Resistance’

California will lead the blue states resisting changes by the incoming Trump administration, in line with Gov. Newsom’s Nov. 6 proclamation. Most of the substantive labor protections in California are already stronger than federal law, but the state will attempt to push the legal envelope into areas of federal control—such as protecting immigrant workers and finding ways to make it easier for employees to unionize.

Specifically, Newsom and the state legislature kicked off a special session on Dec. 2 to propose a “new litigation fund of up to $25 million for the California Department of Justice (DOJ) and state agencies to defend California from unconstitutional federal overreach, challenge illegal federal actions in court, and take administrative actions to reduce potential harm.” Legislation that establishes the fund is expected to be signed into law.

California Will Ramp Up Privacy Efforts 

California privacy officials recently pushed forward key initiatives that could impact certain businesses and employers, including by initiating formal rulemaking that would significantly impact those using resume-screening and other automated decision-making technology. These regulations will ultimately only apply to businesses that are subject to the California Consumer Privacy Act.

In addition, while a renewed push for a federal privacy law is likely, the aim of this legislation will largely be to supersede the patchwork of state laws on the books and reduce the perceived administrative burden of compliance—particularly for broad laws like California’s. Any such federal law would avoid touching on employment-related data or providing a private right of action, sparking California and other blue states to file suit to maintain their own comprehensive laws and retain as much power as possible.

Industry-Specific Regulation

Labor advocates succeeded in California this year with the creation of a Fast Food Council, a fast-food specific minimum wage, and a health care minimum wage. In a tough environment for union organizing (which may be made even tougher under a second Trump administration), labor advocates will look to explore other creative ways to legislate specific working standards for other industries.

For example, the Los Angeles City Council voted on Dec. 11 in favor of a motion that brings the city one step closer to increasing the minimum wage rate for hotel and airport workers to $22.50 per hour starting July 1, 2025, followed by annual increases until reaching $30 per hour in 2028—just before the city hosts the 2028 Summer Olympics.

Benjamin M. Ebbink is an attorney with Fisher Phillips in Sacramento, Calif., and Washington, D.C. © 2025 Fisher Phillips. All rights reserved. Reposted with permission.