Share

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus convallis sem tellus, vitae egestas felis vestibule ut.

Error message details.

Reuse Permissions

Request permission to republish or redistribute SHRM content and materials.

Avoid Potential PAGA Claims Based on Cal/OSHA Violations


Two manufacturing employees, both with hard helmets on, on manufacturing floor, and one of them is pointing.

With proper planning, Golden State manufacturing employers can mitigate the risk of Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims premised on alleged violations of the California Occupational Safety and Health Act (Cal/OSHA).

What Is PAGA?

The California PAGA statute permits aggrieved employees to file lawsuits on behalf of themselves and other current or former employees against an employer to recover civil penalties for violating the California Labor Code. Thus, PAGA deputizes employees to enforce labor laws on behalf of the state of California.

The number of PAGA notices submitted per year between 2014 and 2023 averaged more than 5,500, hitting a high of nearly 8,000 in 2023.

Historically, PAGA claims primarily focused on seeking penalties based on alleged wage and hour violations (such as failure to pay minimum wage and overtime compensation, missed meal and rest period premiums, failure to pay timely final wages, inaccurate wage statements, and failure to reimburse necessary business expenses).

Emerging PAGA-related activity suggests more attention is being paid to Cal/OSHA violations than ever before. PAGA notices, especially those filed against manufacturing employers, increasingly include potential claims for health and safety violations under Cal/OSHA. Relatedly, pre-litigation requests for payroll and staff records are asking for occupational safety and health records, as well—including the employer’s Injury and Illness Prevention Program, Hazard Communication Program,, Workplace Violence Prevention Plan, and injury logs.

Intersection of PAGA and Cal/OSHA

The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health enforces workplace safety standards in California. Because the standards are under the California Labor Code, PAGA authorizes employees to seek penalties for an employer’s alleged failure to comply with Cal/OSHA requirements. These potential failures include the following:

  • Failure to provide a place of employment that is safe and healthy.
  • Failure to furnish and use safety devices and safeguards, and to adopt and use practices, means, methods, operations, and processes that are reasonably adequate to render such employment and place of employment safe and healthy.
  • Failure to implement and maintain an effective written injury and illness prevention program. 
  • Requiring or permitting an employee to go to any place of employment or be in any type of employment that is not safe and healthy.
  • Failure or neglect to furnish and use reasonably adequate safety devices and safeguards, adopt or use reasonably adequate methods and processes, or do every other thing reasonably necessary to protect the lives, safety, and health of employees.

Mitigating the Risks

Recent amendments to PAGA permit employers to cap potential PAGA penalties by showing that all reasonable steps were taken to comply with the Labor Code. Therefore, manufacturing employers should consider proactively ensuring compliance with Cal/OSHA standards, both before a PAGA notice is filed and once notice of potential claims under PAGA is received. Steps employers may take to mitigate risk include the following:

1.      Ensure periodic safety audits are being performed and all hazards are promptly corrected.

2.      Disseminate lawful written safety policies and protocols to employees and regularly review and update written policies to ensure compliance with Cal/OSHA standards.

3.      Provide training to educate and remind managers, supervisors, and employees about safety standards and protocols. 

4.      If a safety violation occurs, address it immediately. Implement corrective actions and document the steps taken to rectify the issue.

Eric J. Gitig is an attorney with Jackson Lewis in Los Angeles. © 2024 Jackson Lewis. All rights reserved. Reposted with permission.

Advertisement

​An organization run by AI is not a futuristic concept. Such technology is already a part of many workplaces and will continue to shape the labor market and HR. Here's how employers and employees can successfully manage generative AI and other AI-powered systems.

Advertisement