The normal difficulties that employers have adhering to the technical requirements of COBRA have been exacerbated during the past two years as COBRA rules were changed to recognize the complications accompanying the COVID-19 pandemic.
This added complexity is particularly worrisome as mistakes in administering COBRA can result in Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) penalties, an excise tax, unintended self-insurance of medical claims, and litigation, including class-action lawsuits.
To better mitigate their exposure, employers should know these significant COBRA compliance developments.
Updated model COBRA notices.
On May 1, 2020, the Department of Labor (DOL) published a new model general COBRA notice and a new model election COBRA notice. The primary update to the DOL model notices is an added section for those considering Medicare in lieu of COBRA. Use of the model notices, if properly adapted for the specifics of an employer's group health plan, is considered good faith compliance with the notice content requirements of COBRA. The model notices are available on the DOL website.
Extended COBRA Deadlines.
On April 29, 2020, the DOL and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Joint Notice extending many deadlines relating to COBRA, including the deadlines for an individual to elect COBRA coverage and pay COBRA premiums. Generally, the deadlines were extended by requiring plans to disregard the period from March 1, 2020, until 60 days after the announced end of the COVID-19 National Emergency (known as the "outbreak period"). The DOL later issued guidance clarifying that a COBRA deadline cannot be delayed for more than one year after the date of the original deadline.
This extension of COBRA deadlines is still in effect. An employer should consider revising its standard COBRA notices to reflect the extended deadlines or provide a supplemental notice explaining the revised deadlines.
[Note: On Feb.18, President Joe Biden formally extended the COVID-19 National Emergency, which was set to expire on March 1, 2022, by up to another year unless ended earlier by executive order. ]
COBRA subsidy
The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) included a provision to fully subsidize COBRA premiums for a period of up to six months from April 1, 2021, through Sept. 30, 2021, for individuals who lost health coverage (including dental and vision) due to involuntary termination or reduction in hours since November 2019.
The DOL issued model ARPA COBRA notices and guidance, which required health plans to notify eligible employees about the availability of the subsidy.
The IRS followed with its own expansive guidance on the ARPA subsidy and related tax credit issues for those employers paying for the subsidy.
Though the COBRA premium subsidy ended on Sept. 30, 2021, employers that did not administer the ARPA subsidy provisions correctly may still need to take actions to mitigate their risks (COBRA's existing penalty structure also applies to failures relating to ARPA subsidies).
Increase in COBRA litigation.
Even before the above changes went into effect, there had been an explosion of class action litigation under COBRA. These cases usually alleged a purely technical violation of the content requirement of the COBRA notice, showing little or no actual harm to the plaintiff class members.
As the complexity of COBRA administration has grown in the past two years, these class action lawsuits will likely continue to take advantage of the situation. Consequently, it is essential that employers take steps to mitigate their exposure.
Keith A. Dropkin is a principal in the White Plains, N.Y., office of law firm Jackson Lewis, where he counsels clients regarding various benefit issues. © 2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. All rights reserved. Republished with permission.
Related SHRM Articles:
Agencies Revise—and Complicate—COBRA Deadline Extensions, SHRM Online, March 2021
When Can Employers Terminate COBRA Coverage During the COVID-19 Outbreak Period?, SHRM Online, November 2020
Will New COBRA Notices Help Retirees Avoid Medicare Mistakes?, SHRM Online, May 2020
Related Content
HR must always include human intelligence and oversight of AI in decision-making in hiring and firing, a legal expert said at SHRM24. She added that HR can ensure compliance by meeting the strictest AI standards, which will be in Colorado’s upcoming AI law.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.
Advertisement
An organization run by AI is not a futuristic concept. Such technology is already a part of many workplaces and will continue to shape the labor market and HR. Here's how employers and employees can successfully manage generative AI and other AI-powered systems.
Advertisement