Location is one of the primary factors used in benchmarking pay rates and developing salary ranges for most jobs. Below are summary results and analysis from the 2009 Culpepper Geographic Pay Differential Practices Survey, which looks at how North American companies use geographic pay differentials to design salary programs and manage differences in pay among locations.
Key Survey Findings
- 73 percent of surveyed companies with employees in more than one location report that they provide geographic pay differentials or adjust pay rates based on location.
- 68 percent of companies with geographic pay differentials review their differentials annually.
- Over 80 percent of non-executive employees are eligible for geographic pay differentials.
- 89 percent of companies use salary surveys (cost of labor) to determine geographic pay differentials.
- Three out of four companies with geographic pay differentials adjust compensation by creating separate salary structures for locations.
Geographic Pay Differential Defined
A geographic pay differential is additional compensation paid to an employee to account for variations in cost of labor and/or cost of living among geographic locations.
Some companies use cost of living (e.g., cost of goods and services) as a factor to determine geographic pay differentials. However, most use cost of labor (e.g., compensation) as the primary factor to determine pay differences among geographic locations.
The following approaches are typically used to compensate employees for differences among geographic locations.
- Separate base salary structures for different locations.
- Individual adjustments to base salaries.
- Supplemental geographic differential payments.
Use of Geographic Pay Differentials
Seventy-three percent of surveyed companies with employees in more than one location report that they provide geographic pay differentials or adjust pay rates based on location. However, as companies increase in size, they are significantly more likely to use geographic pay differentials.
Only 28 percent of companies with fewer than 100 employees across multiple geographic locations use geographic pay differentials. In contrast, 76 percent of companies with more than 100 employees across multiple geographic locations use geographic pay differentials.
Use of Geographic Pay Differentials | |
All Companies | 73% |
Number of Employees | |
1 to 100 | 28% |
101 to 500 | 66% |
501 to 2,500 | 72% |
2,501 to 10,000 | 80% |
Over 10,000 | 86% |
* Based on companies with operations in more than one geographic location. | |
Frequency Companies Review Geographic Pay Differentials
Most companies review their geographic pay differentials annually.
Frequency of Reviewing Geographic Pay Differentials | |
Annually | 68% |
Every two years | 19% |
Every three years | 4% |
On as-needed basis | 4% |
Other | 5% |
Geographic Pay Differentials by Job Level
Over 80 percent of companies provide geographic pay differentials to employees below the executive ranks. Executives are less likely to be eligible for geographic pay differentials than non-executive employees.
Companies Providing Geographic Pay Differentials by Job Level | |
Executives | 38% |
Director and manager level | 77% |
Professional level | 87% |
Hourly and nonexempt | 85% |
Other/varies | 2% |
Companies choosing “other” indicated that the types of structures used varies by type of job, business unit, location or union status.
Types of Data Used as Basis to Determine Geographic Pay Differentials
Eighty-nine percent of companies with geographic pay differentials use salary surveys gauging cost of labor to determine geographic pay differentials.
Types of Data Used to Determine Geographic Pay Differentials | |
Cost of labor (e.g., salary surveys) | 89% |
Cost of living differentials | 38% |
Inflation data (e.g., consumer price index) | 13% |
Employment and unemployment data | 3% |
Note: Participants could select more than one response. | |
While 38 percent of companies use cost-of-living data as a basis to determine geographic pay differentials, most of these companies also use cost-of-labor data from salary surveys. Only 11 percent use cost-of-living data as their primary source to determine geographic pay differentials.
Methods to Assign Locations to Geographic Pay Differentials
Sixty percent of companies with geographic pay differentials use individual city data to assign locations to geographic pay differentials. Market pricing jobs by city is widely considered a best practice for assigning locations to geographic pay differentials. However, it is not always practical or possible to do so. As an alternative, 24 percent of companies create geographic pay differentials by grouping locations with similar market rates (geographic pay zones).
Methods Used to Assign Locations to Geographic Pay Differentials | |
By city | 60% |
By state or province | 20% |
By broad region or territory | 20% |
By country | 12% |
By locations within a certain distance | 11% |
By locations with similar market rates (geographic pay zones) | 24% |
Note: Participants could select more than one response. | |
---
Data source: Survey dates: Breakdown by industry sector:
Breakdown by size:
Breakdown by Ownership/Corporate Status:
|
Culpepper and Associates conducts worldwide salary surveys and provides benchmark data for compensation and employee benefit programs.
Reposted with permission
Source: Culpepper Geographic Pay Differential Practices Survey, November 2009,www.culpepper.com
Related Articles:
2009 Global Salary Increase Budgets Change Significantly, SHRM Online Compensation Discipline, March 2009
Expats Still Essential, but Recession Changes Their Roles, HR News, March 2009
Flexibility and Customization: A New Paradigm for Global Compensation Systems, SHRM Online Compensation Discipline, April 2008
Related Video:
Designing Global Compensation, SHRM Multimedia, April 2008
Quick Links:
SHRM Online Compensation Discipline
Sign up for SHRM’s free Compensation & Benefits e-newsletter |
An organization run by AI is not a futuristic concept. Such technology is already a part of many workplaces and will continue to shape the labor market and HR. Here's how employers and employees can successfully manage generative AI and other AI-powered systems.
Related Content
HR must always include human intelligence and oversight of AI in decision-making in hiring and firing, a legal expert said at SHRM24. She added that HR can ensure compliance by meeting the strictest AI standards, which will be in Colorado’s upcoming AI law.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.
Learn how Marsh McLennan successfully boosts staff well-being with digital tools, improving productivity and work satisfaction for more than 20,000 employees.