If paid-time-off (PTO) programs that bank together sick days, personal days and vacation days are helping to reduce unscheduled absences, as survey data suggest, why aren’t more employers embracing them?
The 2007 Survey of Traditional Time Off and PTO Program Practices by the Alexander Hamilton Institute, a provider of employment law information, shows that the majority of the over 1,700 organizations that responded still use a traditional-time-off (TTO) program. Specifically:
- 63 percent of respondents track sick, personal and vacation time in separate banks.
- 37 percent combine leave time into one PTO bank.
Many said they haven’t switched to a PTO approach because they are:
- Unionized employers that need to negotiate paid time off.
- Government employers that need to credit sick time toward retirement benefits.
- Employers in states with laws requiring payment of accrued vacation time on termination, so keeping vacation, personal and sick leave separate cuts down on the amount of time that needs to be paid out.
While unionized and government employers have greater forces to contend with than just convincing their workforce that switching to a PTO solution is a good idea, PTO advocates say that termination pay and other cost reasons might be shortsighted and that employers should weigh those costs against the potential savings of reducing unscheduled absences.
“One of the incentives for switching from TTO to PTO is to cut down on the number of unscheduled absences, and survey results support the notion that it works,” said Alexander Hamilton Institute President Schuyler T. Jenks.
Jenks recounts that when asked how many workdays their employees missed because of unscheduled absences each year, most PTO and TTO employers almost equally said three to four days. But more PTO than TTO employees missed only one to two days, while more TTO than PTO employees missed five to six days.
| Unscheduled Absences Employers were asked how many workdays their employees missed without prior notice. | ||
| Unscheduled Absences | Those with traditional-time-off programs: | Those with paid-time-off programs: |
| 1 to 2 days | 22.8% | 29.8% |
| 3 to 4 days | 36.1% | 38.6% |
| 5 to 6 days | 26.6% | 20.3% |
| Source: Alexander Hamilton Institute. | ||
When PTO employers were asked if implementing a PTO program had reduced unscheduled absences, more than half (56.5 percent) replied in the affirmative. Of those respondents:
- 54 percent said unscheduled absences were reduced up to 10 percent.
- 2.5 percent said unscheduled absences dropped between 11 percent and 20 percent.
- 3.6 percent said unscheduled absences dropped more than 20 percent.
Of all PTO users, a large majority said that their PTO program either met their expectations (78.4 percent) or exceeded them (14.6 percent).
Stephen Miller is editor/manager of SHRM Online's Compensation & Benefits Focus Area.
An organization run by AI is not a futuristic concept. Such technology is already a part of many workplaces and will continue to shape the labor market and HR. Here's how employers and employees can successfully manage generative AI and other AI-powered systems.
Related Content
HR must always include human intelligence and oversight of AI in decision-making in hiring and firing, a legal expert said at SHRM24. She added that HR can ensure compliance by meeting the strictest AI standards, which will be in Colorado’s upcoming AI law.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.
Learn how Marsh McLennan successfully boosts staff well-being with digital tools, improving productivity and work satisfaction for more than 20,000 employees.