During POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment) awareness sessions, employees often ask critical questions to understand their rights, responsibilities, and the organization’s complaint-handling process.
These discussions reveal employees' anxieties and misconceptions, from concerns about confidentiality to fear of false complaints.
Top 5 Frequently Asked POSH Questions and Recommendations
Based on my 9+ years of experience as a POSH trainer, here are the top 5 questions employees frequently ask—and my recommendations for IC Members and HR.
Will my complaint be kept confidential? How is confidentiality ensured?
Confidentiality is crucial and legally mandated under Section 16 of the POSH Act. However, it is only as strong as the IC Members enforcing it. The maturity, training, and professionalism of the Presiding Officer and External Member play a key role in ensuring confidentiality.
Suggestions for IC and HR:
✅ Use NDAs—Have all individuals who access case details (e.g., IC Members, parties, witnesses, transcribers) sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).
✅ Reinforce confidentiality—Before and after every meeting, the Presiding Officer (PO) or External Member should remind everyone about confidentiality rules.
✅ Enforce penalties—
Breach by employees or witnesses? Impose a monetary fine as per POSH Policy (₹5,000 per Rule 12, but a higher amount can be set).
Breach by an IC Member? Immediate removal from the IC as per Section 4(5)(a).
2. What if the accused is someone senior or in a position of power? Will the process be fair?
Many employees worry that the process will be biased if the respondent is a senior leader. However, POSH law ensures fairness for both parties—irrespective of position, rank, or influence. The key challenge? The ability of IC members to handle power dynamics.
Suggestions for IC and HR:
✅ Understand IC authority—The Presiding Officer must be a senior female employee but does not need to be senior to the respondent.
✅ Empower IC Members—
IC Members must be mentally strong, well-trained, and unbiased.
- If an IC Member feels intimidated or fears retaliation, they should recuse themselves.
✅ Ensure a fair process and support:
Provide IC training on handling power imbalances.
Use interim relief measures (Section 12, Rule 8) to prevent retaliation:
a) Paid leave for complainant (up to 3 months).
b) Transfer the respondent to another department/location.
Be fair to both parties. The seniority of the respondent shouldn’t make the IC members tilt in their favor or against them.
✅ Leverage the External Member—Their role is to ensure neutrality and prevent workplace bias from affecting the inquiry.
3. What will happen if there is a false complaint against me without proof?
This is one of the most common questions from male employees, reflecting a fear of false allegations—especially post #MeToo. However, my experience shows that false complaints are rare in organized sectors with strong workplace cultures.
Suggestions for IC and HR:
✅ Dispel unnecessary fear—Employees should feel safe, knowing that the process is fact-based, not assumption-based.
✅ Clarify what qualifies as a "false complaint"—
A lack of evidence does not automatically mean the complaint is false.
A complaint is considered malicious only if proven so through an inquiry.
✅ What happens if a complaint is truly malicious?
The complainant can be penalized with the same punishment that the respondent would have faced.
Witnesses who provide false testimony may also face penalties.
4. Will filing a complaint (or being the respondent in a complaint) affect my work environment?
Both complainant and respondents worry that a POSH complaint will negatively impact their careers, reputations, or work environments. Ideally, if the IC, HR, and employer handle the case properly, work should not be affected.
Challenges and Solutions:
✅ Ensure confidentiality – Physical and IT infrastructure must protect privacy.
- Conduct inquiry in a secure location (away from workspaces or in a rented conference room).
✅ Prevent gossip and bias—
Strictly penalize leaks and enforce NDAs.
Remind IC members and parties about confidentiality before and after every meeting.
✅ Follow due process—
No pressure to "close the case quickly"— A fair inquiry takes time (up to 3 months).
- IC Members should not be burdened with business duties during an inquiry.
✅ Balance fairness for both parties—
The complainant should feel safe.
The respondent should not be presumed guilty without a fair inquiry.
✅ Train everyone: Employees, HR, and managers must understand POSH principles of natural justice and parties’ rights.
5. Can I make a complaint anonymously or without revealing my identity?
This question often comes from employees who fear retaliation, stigma, or losing their jobs. While POSH allows complaints from third parties (in some cases), anonymity is not allowed.
Why can’t complaints remain anonymous?
❌ Respondents have the right to defend themselves.
❌ IC needs details to investigate fairly.
❌ Justice should not only be served but seen to be served.
Suggestions for IC and HR:
✅ Address employee fears—Build trust in IC and HR through awareness programs.
✅ Explain why identity is needed—
How can the respondents defend themselves without knowing who accused them?
✅ Reassure confidentiality—
Only IC Members and necessary parties will know the complainant’s identity.
Ensure NDAs are signed to prevent leaks.
Final Thoughts
These top 5 questions highlight employees' biggest concerns about POSH complaints—confidentiality, fairness, false cases, retaliation, and anonymity. For organizations to build a safe and supportive workplace:
✅ Regular IC Training and Quarterly Meetings—To improve IC preparedness and decision-making.
✅ Stronger Confidentiality Measures—Including NDAs, IT security, and penalizing breaches.
✅ Leadership Support—Ensuring IC Members are not assigned business duties during inquiries.
✅ Clarity and Transparency—Employees must trust that POSH is not about punishing men or protecting women but about a fair, respectful workplace for all.
With the right policies, training, and leadership commitment, organizations can foster a workplace where everyone feels safe, heard, and respected.
Also Read: POSH & DEI: Allies in Building a Better Workplace
An organization run by AI is not a futuristic concept. Such technology is already a part of many workplaces and will continue to shape the labor market and HR. Here's how employers and employees can successfully manage generative AI and other AI-powered systems.