Agencies Delay Health Plan Price Transparency Disclosures
Employers receive a brief reprieve from January 2022 compliance deadlines
New regulatory guidance from three federal agencies that enforce private-sector benefits laws will make employers' daunting 2021 health benefit to-do lists slightly—but only slightly—more manageable heading into 2022.
Most importantly, the frequently asked questions (FAQ) guidance delays several of the most challenging 2021 and 2022 compliance requirements under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA) and the Affordable Care Act (ACA):
- So-called "advanced explanations of benefits" (EOBs) providing good-faith estimates of the out-of-pocket costs for scheduled medical services.
- A "price comparison tool" to enable participants to compare cost-sharing amounts for specific network providers.
- Extensive drug cost information that was to have been reported to the federal regulators in December 2021.
- Public pricing disclosures related to in-network rates, out-of-network allowed costs and prescription drug prices.
The FAQ guidance, issued Aug. 20, 2021, by the U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and U.S. Department of the Treasury, also provides some relief or useful clarifications related to other key 2021 health benefit compliance items for employers, including gag clauses, identification cards, continuity-of-care requirements and provider directories.
The FAQ guidance neither delays nor provides other relief related to the new surprise medical billing requirements under the No Surprises Act, which was enacted as part of the CAA and is set to take effect Jan. 1, 2022, or the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act "comparative analysis" required by the CAA, which is already in effect.
Here is a summary of the key employer takeaways in the new FAQ guidance.
Advanced EOBs
Under the No Surprises Act, plans are required to provide good-faith estimates of expected provider charges for a specific scheduled service, along with good-faith estimates of the cost sharing that would apply to a participant, and the amount already incurred toward any financial responsibility limits. This was initially set to take effect Jan. 1, 2022, but the guidance indicates that the agencies will defer enforcement until regulations are issued on these plan disclosures and the disclosures required by medical providers. (Question 6)
Price Comparison Tool and Public Price Disclosures
Under the No Surprises Act, plans are required to offer online tools and phone support to enable participants to compare cost-sharing amounts for specific network providers in a specific region. Separately, under the ACA, plans are required to offer three "machine-readable files" on a public website covering in-network rates, out-of-network allowable amounts, and prescription drug prices.
Both the No Surprises Act and ACA requirements were set to take effect on Jan. 1, 2022. The guidance delays the effective date of the No Surprises Act requirements to Jan. 1, 2023, and the ACA in-network and out-of-network requirements to July 1, 2022. The ACA prescription drug requirement is delayed until the agencies issue regulations on the matter. (Questions 1-3)
Drug Cost Reporting
The CAA requires employer plans to report very detailed prescription drug cost information to the agencies, including the 50 most commonly covered drugs per plan, the 50 most expensive drugs per plan, and the total health spending for each plan broken out into specific categories. The initial reports were to be provided to the agencies by Dec. 27, 2021, and then by June 1, 2022. The agencies will defer enforcement related to the 2021 and 2022 reports until they issue further guidance, though the agencies "strongly encourage plans" to get ready to report 2020 and 2021 plan year data no later than Dec. 27, 2022. (Question 12)
Gag Clauses
Under the CAA, plans cannot enter into network or other agreements that would prevent them from making available provider-specific cost or quality-of-care information to providers or participants, electronically accessing de-identified claims and encounter information for each participant (consistent with privacy laws), or sharing either of those types of information with business associates. Plans have to attest to the agencies each year that they have no such clauses in their agreements. This requirement took effect on enactment of the CAA on Dec. 27, 2020, and is not changed by the FAQ guidance. The agencies have indicated that additional guidance is forthcoming on how plans will attest to their compliance. (Question 7)
Insurance Cards
Under the No Surprises Act, plans have to update physical or electronic insurance cards to include network and out-of-network deductibles and out-of-pocket limits and consumer assistance contact information. This is set to take effect on Jan. 1, 2022, a date unchanged by the FAQ guidance. The guidance does clarify, though, that the agencies will consider both data actually on the cards and data "made available through information that is provided on the ID card." (Question 4)
Continuity of Care
Under the No Surprises Act, when a provider or network contract is terminated, plans have to take steps to protect hospitalized or other continuing care patients. This requirement will take effect on Jan. 1, 2022. The guidance clarifies that the agencies intend to issue formal regulations on this requirement, but will not do so before the effective date. Until such regulations take effect, plans will be held to a good-faith compliance standard. (Question 10)
Provider Directories
Under the No Surprises Act, plans are required to take several steps to improve provider directories, such as updating them at least every 90 days, and more promptly notifying participants about whether a particular provider is in the network. These requirements will take effect on Jan. 1, 2022, and the guidance does not change that. The agencies do indicate that they intend to issue formal regulations in the future, and may also have specific additional guidance on required disclosure of balance billing information. (Questions 8 and 9)
Timothy J. Stanton is an attorney in the Chicago office of Ogletree Deakins, where his practice focuses on Affordable Care Act compliance and benefit plan administration issues. Timothy G. Verrall is an attorney in the firm's Houston office, where he advises clients on employee benefit plan issues. © 2021, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. All rights reserved. Republished with permission.
Related SHRM Articles:
Health Plan Transparency Reporting in 2022: Do You Know Where Your Health Care Dollars Go?, SHRM Online, January 2022
Fee Disclosure Requirements for Health Plan Advisors Shed Light on Conflicts, SHRM Online, January 2022
Health Plan and Provider Price Transparency Obligations Can't Be Ignored, SHRM Online, July 2021
Final Rule Requires Health Plans to Disclose Prices for 'Shoppable' Care, SHRM Online, November 2020
An organization run by AI is not a futuristic concept. Such technology is already a part of many workplaces and will continue to shape the labor market and HR. Here's how employers and employees can successfully manage generative AI and other AI-powered systems.
Related Content
HR must always include human intelligence and oversight of AI in decision-making in hiring and firing, a legal expert said at SHRM24. She added that HR can ensure compliance by meeting the strictest AI standards, which will be in Colorado’s upcoming AI law.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.
Learn how Marsh McLennan successfully boosts staff well-being with digital tools, improving productivity and work satisfaction for more than 20,000 employees.