New Member Promotion Ends 9/30 >>> Save $15 and get a SHRM tote!
Employers are offering creative perks to attract and retain today’s workers.
Plus all the HR resources you need to be more efficient and effective this fall!
Prepare for your exam with the guidance of a SHRM-certified instructor in Boston, Oct. 24-26.
Learn how to make the business case for diversity, October 25-27.
The proposed 2015 budget highlights income inequality and tax fairness issues
Although there is a broad consensus that President Barack Obama's 2015 budget proposal, released on March 4, 2014, has no chance of being enacted by Congress, the budget highlights the income inequality and tax fairnessissues that the administration would like Democrats to champion in the 2014 midterm congressional elections, in the hope that a future Congress might treat them more favorably.
For this reason it's worth considering how the proposed "wish list" (as the budget was described by Politico) would affect employer-provided retirement plans, regulatory enforcement and other aspects of employment law.
Caps on Retirement Plan Deductions
As in previous years, the proposed budget calls for limiting tax-advantaged defined contribution accounts, such as those in 401(k) and 403(b) plans, at the point they are estimated to provide an annual retirement income of $205,000 if converted to an annuity. This would currently translate into a cap of approximately $3.4 million in account value, to be adjusted annually.
In addition, the proposal would limit itemized deductions overall to 28 percent on income above $200,000 ($250,000 for joint filers).
"Tax-preferred savings accounts were intended to help middle class families save for retirement," the budget reads. "However, under current rules, some wealthy individuals are able to accumulate millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to ensure a secure retirement."
Brian Graff, executive director and CEO of the American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries, responded in a media statement:
"If a small-business owner has saved $3 million in his or her 401(k) account, or has a pension from another plan and a modest amount in their 401(k) or IRA, they won’t be allowed to save any more. Without any further incentive to keep the plan, many small-business owners will now either shut down the plan or reduce contributions for workers. This means that employees of small businesses will now lose out not only on the opportunity to save at work but also on contributions the owner would have made on their behalf to pass nondiscrimination rules."
Moreover, under what Graff termed the “double taxation” budget proposal, "small-business owners earning more than $250,000 would have to pay tax on contributions in the year the contributions are made and then pay tax at the full rate when contributions are distributed at retirement. This amounts to a penalty for saving through a 401(k) plan. Who could blame a small-business owner for thinking that if the government is going to penalize them for saving in a retirement plan, maybe they should not have that plan?"
Higher PBGC Premiums
The president's budget also authorizes the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC) to raise by $20 billion over the next decade the premiums that employers pay to the agency to insure the solvency of their defined benefit pension plans. According to the budget proposal, "Congress has raised [PBGC] premiums twice since 2012, but rates remain much lower than what a private financial institution would charge for insuring the same risk."
The ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC), however, recently released a statement saying that it is "deeply troubled" by proposals that would further increase premiums paid to the PBGC by companies that sponsor pension plans and that more premium increases "will only further accelerate the demise of the pension system, as plan sponsors become increasingly discouraged from voluntarily providing pensions," with the result of "further harming retirement security and the participants the system is intended to help."
Increased Enforcement Budgets
As enumerated by the Department of Labor, the president's budget includes additional funds to step up enforcement of a wide range of employer regulations, including:
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies